Last night the opposition rose to victory by a margin of 15,000 votes. After a long and bitter fought battle between the two parties, of negative campaigning and name calling, the opposition was able to claim victory by about 3:30am. For most people this is a long awaited step in the right direction for democracy in the Maldives. The opposition has constantly blamed the government for being too restrictive on our rights, and deliberately curtailing progress. In addition, the government have been unable to address severe problems in our society – drugs, rise in crime, and population congestion. Many see the ousting of the incumbent president as opening a pathway to solving these problems.
There were many factors for the rise, and ultimate victory for the opposition. Several structural shifts in society happened in the early 2000’s, which allowed for this victory. Population congestion and a booming youth population, coupled with communication technologies, like mobile phones and the Internet, fuelled the drive toward democracy. The opposition, resolute and steadfast in their determination having learned much from the defeats in the 90’s, was able to mobilise and activate a loyal base of support. The past five years had been intense, as we saw several changes taking place in a relatively short period. Political parties, the freedom of assembly, independent newspapers, radio stations, TV channels, and a new constitution. Looking back, it feels like a swirling chaotic whirlwind, breaking through the old political guard, demolishing its power and hold on the country.
What does this mean for the ordinary person? We demanded Change. By change what we meant was that to secure the safety and prosperity of the country, we do need a change in leadership, and that it was essential for any progress to occur. I am by nature deeply pessimistic. I do not foresee any quick and easy resolution to the social and economic problems that we have in the country. The challenge for the newly elected leadership is to show that safety, security, and prosperity could be achieved in a functioning, flourishing democracy, without the need of a benevolent dictator. This is indeed most fundamental for our faith in this democracy. Gayyoom left a large shoe to be filled in terms of prosperity. It will be hard to achieve all our hopes and dreams in a short period. We have partially achieved our objectives. There’s more to be done.
Where will I be in this ‘Aneh Dhivehi Raajje’ ? I have always been critical of authority and power, and will continue to be so. Not because it is easy or convenient, but because it is necessary to maintain our flourishing democracy. So, don’t be surprised if you see me making fun of Anni.
